No Fee Until We Collect
Call Today

What Type of Cancer Does the CPAP Machine Cause?

What Type of Cancer Does the CPAP Machine Cause

In the wake of recent recalls, users of CPAP machines may wonder, “what type of cancer does the CPAP Machine Cause?” As of 2021, Philips recalled its defective sleep apnea devices that could cause various cancers, such as lung cancer, brain cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, among others. Users of these devices may recover compensation through a lawsuit against Philips. CPAP device users should learn about the types of cancers these devices can cause, and the specific devices involved in the recall.

How CPAP Machines Cause Cancer

In April 2021, Philips announced that it would recall many of its continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), and ventilator devices because of the health risks they pose.

So, how can a CPAP machine cause cancer? Philips devices present health risks because they use a sound abatement foam, which dampens the noise that the devices produce. This foam consists of polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) that has the potential to disintegrate over time, releasing harmful particles and gasses that users may inhale or swallow. These chemicals contain a variety of carcinogens that can increase the risk of developing many types of cancer over time with long periods of exposure.

What Is Polyurethane Foam?

PE-PUR foam appears in many products. Manufacturers often rely on this material because of its sound-deadening and low-density properties. The nature of this material makes it particularly popular for use in respiratory care and sleep apnea devices. However, PE-PUR easily breaks down when exposed to heat, sunlight, microbes, moisture, fungus, and oxygen.

PUR foam on its own is a specific kind of polymeric foam that’s part of a family of other high-strength yet lightweight foams. The Philips recall brought more scrutiny to this material because of the potentially toxic chemicals it produces when it degrades.

Specifically, PUR foam contains isocyanates, which fall under a class of highly toxic chemicals. The characteristics of isocyanates include a low molecular weight combined with high reactivity. The most common types of health issues associated with isocyanates are respiratory issues. Exposure to these compounds can cause a variety of health problems, including bronchitis, asthma, and pneumonia, among other more serious conditions. Additionally, prolonged exposure can lead to types of cancer affecting the lungs and other parts of the body.

A few of the specific isocyanates that PE-PUR foam releases include toluene diamine, toluene diisocyanate, and diethylene glycol. Some side effects of inhaling or ingesting these chemicals are: hypersensitivity, airway inflammation and irritation, sinus infections, organ damage, asthma, inflammatory response, cough, headache, dizziness, upper airway irritation, and irritation of the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract.

Philips CPAP, Bi-level PAP, or ventilator machines recall

Types of Cancer Linked to CPAP Machines

Because of the PE-PUR foam used in the machines in the CPAP recalls, users are exposed to isocyanates that can cause a variety of cancers.

Some of the cancers associated with PE-PUR foam and the recalled devices include:

  • Lung cancer
  • Leukemia
  • Lymphatic cancer
  • Breast cancer
  • Nasal cancer
  • Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

The use of these devices may also cause users to develop the following: Multiple myeloma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, brain cancer, stomach cancer, testicular cancer, hematopoietic cancer, and thyroid cancers such as papillary carcinoma.

If users of the recalled Philips devices develop cancer, they may be able to file a lawsuit against Philips for damages linked to their illness. In the process, they may recover compensation with the help of a product liability lawyer.

Was Your CPAP Machine Impacted by the Recall?

If individuals are wondering what CPAP machines are causing cancer, Philips has released a list of all devices involved in the recall. Most of the recalled CPAP devices are in Philips’s DreamStation product line.

The following are the different types of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices that the recall affected:

  • DreamStation CPAP, Auto CPAP, and BiPAP
  • DreamStation GO CPAP and APAP
  • DreamStation ASV
  • DreamStation SV/AVAPS
  • SystemOne Q Series
  • Dorma 400/500 CPAP

The recall also impacted devices such as: REMStar SE Auto CPAP; SystemOne ASV4; C Series ASV, S/T, and AVAPS; OmniLab Advanced Plus In-Lab Titration Device; E30 Continuous Ventilator; Trilogy 100 and 200 Ventilators; A-Series BiPAP Hybrid A30, V30 Auto, and V30; and Garbin Plus, Aeris, and LifeVent Ventilators.

If individuals have used any of these machines, they can get into the Philips repair and replacement program. If sleep apnea device users aren’t sure whether they qualify for the recall, they can visit the Philips website and look up their device’s serial number to determine if it’s part of the recall.

What to Do if You Have a Recalled Device

If users of sleep apnea devices discover that their machines are part of the recall, they should immediately cease using them and speak with their doctors about potential alternatives. One of the disadvantages of the timing of the recall is that it has left many sleep apnea device users without a machine to replace the previous model without upgrading. 

If individuals are using life-sustaining devices, they should speak with their doctors to gauge the risks involved and figure out what to do next. Patients and their doctors should discuss the right care decisions that will meet their needs. 

Philips Class Action Lawsuit

For users that the recall has affected, it may be possible to file a class-action lawsuit if health issues pertaining to these devices have developed. 

This recall is particularly serious, with a Class I classification, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which indicates that the defective CPAP machines and other devices involved can cause serious or even life-threatening injuries and illness. This makes it, unlike other lawsuits where the defendant is likely to deny that the products were defective, as Philips Respironics has acknowledged the dangers the recalled devices pose.

Attorneys have begun filing lawsuits on behalf of victims who’ve suffered health issues and used the defective machines. Over time, more recall lawsuits will likely develop due to the overwhelming evidence that Philips was aware of the specific risks associated with the recalled devices and failed to warn customers early enough.

Although it’s often difficult to prove that the product caused the injury or illness in the majority of mass tort cases, the CPAP lawsuit is an exception. Philips became aware of the issues its devices caused due to the PE-PUR foam degradation long before initiating the recall in June 2021.

Philips CPAP, Bi-level PAP, or ventilator machines recall

Types of Recoverable Compensation in CPAP Lawsuits

Attorneys are still initiating litigation in the CPAP recall cases. This means that settlement amounts aren’t determined yet. Additionally, each case varies greatly depending on the types of injuries and illnesses involved, with cancer among the most serious developments.

While a specific settlement amount isn’t clear yet, experts predict that most cancer cases will settle for anywhere between $100,000 and $500,000, with the value of trial cases being even higher if plaintiffs can establish liability. Cases involving respiratory issues that aren’t as severe are likely to see less compensation, but this will depend on the degree of the injury.

In these cases, economic and non-economic damages could play into each lawsuit, along with potential punitive damages.

Economic Damages

These are damages that come with a specific monetary value attached to them. They’re relatively easy to calculate because of this predetermined value.

One example of economic damages involved in the CPAP recall lawsuits is medical costs. Many people whom the recalled CPAP devices affected will require proper diagnosis and treatment, along with potentially long-term care. All of these can come with steep medical costs, depending on the severity of the illness or injury. Compensation for economic damages would help cover these expenses.

Non-Economic Damages

The other main type of damages that may factor into many CPAP recall lawsuits is non-economic. These damages are more subjective, varying from person to person and being less difficult to quantify. 

Pain and suffering are the non-economic damages that many victims of injury and illness are likely to experience. Victims may suffer certain degrees of trauma because of their experience, along with anxiety, depression, and other physical and psychological distress. Although these are traditionally more challenging to calculate, it is possible to do so with the help of sufficient evidence. Attorneys may be able to work with clients to gauge the amount of money recoverable for these damages.

Punitive Damages

In rare cases, punitive damages may play a role. The courts only award these if the defendant practiced gross negligence, as they’re meant to punish the defendant as opposed to compensating the victim. If attorneys can show that Philips practiced gross negligence, victims may qualify for this type of compensation.

Seeking Compensation for Cancer Caused by Defective CPAP Machines

The recalled CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices involved in the Philips recall and subsequent lawsuits can cause various types of cancer, along with other serious illnesses and injuries. If victims believe that they have suffered from cancer or another respiratory issue as a result of the use of a defective Philips product, they may be able to recover compensation via a CPAP lawsuit. A CPAP recall lawyer can help victims build their case and hold Philips accountable.

Table of Contents

If you have been injured:

Call now:

Recent posts

Protecting the rights of injured people since 1940.

Call now:

Latest posts:

Candida Auris fungi, emerging multidrug resistant fungus, 3D illustration. Concept of Aspartame Linked to Cancer Do You Have Grounds to Sue
Mass Torts & Class Actions
Howard Ankin

Aspartame Linked to Cancer: Do You Have Grounds to Sue?

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, a cancer research firm of the World Health Organization (WHO), recently published a study on aspartame’s link to cancer. In the study, the cancer agency labeled aspartame as a possible cause of cancer. However, assessments of its health effects revealed limited evidence for carcinogenicity in humans.

A pile of plastic, used toys. Concept of dangerous and defective children's products
Mass Torts & Class Actions
Howard Ankin

Dangerous and Defective Children’s Products

Dangerous or defective children’s products pose a significant risk to the well-being and safety of their vulnerable users. These toys can have a range of

a concept if did you know about what are they symptoms of roundup poisoning
Mass Torts & Class Actions
Howard Ankin

What Are the Symptoms of Roundup Poisoning?

The symptoms of Roundup poisoning can range from mild to severe, depending on the level of exposure to this toxic pesticide. Typical symptoms include dizziness, headaches, vomiting, breathing difficulty,