Teens and children in foster care and group home settings deserve safety, protection, and adequate care. When a child enters foster care, the state is responsible for making sure they are properly cared for and protected. Sadly, that does not always happen. Too often, vulnerable youth become victims of abuse, neglect, or sexual assault in foster care, group homes, and facilities for troubled youth.
Table of Contents
If you were abused, you are not alone and you don’t have to face this by yourself. Ankin Law can help you understand your rights, identify who may be responsible, and fight to hold them accountable. Call 312 600-0000 for a free, confidential case review.
Key Takeaways
- Aunt Martha’s Integrated Care Center, which shut down in 2024, is being sued for failing to protect its charges from sexual abuse
- A young woman alleges that she was assaulted repeatedly by a member of management when she was 17
- The lawsuit involves Aunt Martha’s, A-Alert Security, and DCFS for failing to intervene
- The manager, who was convicted of sexually assaulting 5 girls, ages 12-17, had previous felony convictions before he was hired
- You can still sue a foster care center even if it has been shut down
- Foster parents cannot sue on behalf of their foster child
Aunt Martha’s Lawsuit Exposes Failures in Foster Care Protection
A recent lawsuit involving sexual abuse at Aunt Martha’s Integrated Care Center highlights the failure of the DCFS to protect the vulnerable youth in its care. The case involves a young woman who, while in foster care at what she described as a “house of horrors”, suffered repeated sexual assault from a staff member in a management position within the facility. Multiple other victims have come forward alleging sexual abuse at the facility.
The lawsuit names Aunt Martha’s, the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), and the facility’s contracted security, A-Alert Security, as defendants. It alleges that all parties named in the lawsuit failed to protect the victims that have come forward about the abuse they experienced within the walls of the house of horrors while in the State’s care.
In March 2026, Trulon Henry, 41, was convicted of sexually assaulting and grooming five children between the ages of 12 and 17 during his time at Aunt Martha’s. He worked as management at the facility from January 2023 to April 2024,
Questions remain about how Henry was hired for a position of authority around vulnerable children, since he was already a convicted felon. When a foster care facility hires someone to supervise, manage, or care for children, proper screening is not optional. It is a basic safety requirement. If warning signs were missed or ignored, that failure may point to negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and a broader breakdown in the systems meant to protect children in state care.
How Negligent Hiring Practices Can Put Foster Children at Risk
Negligent hiring practices within foster care facilities, such as ignoring previous felony convictions, not doing background checks, or failing to monitor their new hires, can lead to dangerous individuals being left in charge of children.
Foster care facilities, group homes, and residential treatment centers are trusted with children who may already be dealing with trauma, instability, or serious family disruption. That trust comes with responsibility. These facilities are expected to screen, train, supervise, and monitor the people they put in positions of authority over vulnerable youth.
When that does not happen, children can be placed directly in harm’s way.
What Are Considered Negligent Hiring Practices in Youth Care Facilities?
Negligent hiring may involve failing to run proper background checks, overlooking criminal history, ignoring past misconduct, hiring unqualified staff, or placing dangerous individuals in supervisory roles. Negligent supervision can be just as dangerous.
Even if a facility conducts an initial background check, it still has a duty to respond to red flags, investigate complaints, monitor staff conduct, and protect children from known or suspected risks.
The allegations involving Aunt Martha’s show why these safeguards are important. The facility was shut down in 2024 after years of abuse allegations, including allegations involving staff misconduct, sexual assault, and failed oversight.
It is more than a simple instance of negligence. When foster care fails to protect the children in their care, victims of childhood sexual abuse carry that weight for the rest of their lives.
Child sexual abuse can cause lasting emotional trauma, PTSD, depression, anxiety, trust issues, behavioral problems, and difficulty feeling safe around people who were supposed to protect them. Foster children and teens are especially vulnerable because they may depend on the same adults who control their housing, daily routine, discipline, transportation, and access to help.
That power imbalance matters.
- A child in state care may be afraid to report abuse.
- They may worry they will not be believed.
- They may fear retaliation.
- They may have already been failed by adults before.
That is why foster care providers, contractors, security companies, and state agencies must take their responsibility seriously from the start. When they do not, they can and should be held accountable.
Can You Still Sue a Foster Care Facility That has Been Shut Down?
You can still sue a foster care facility that has been shut down. Shuttering its doors does not absolve a company of wrongdoing, and they can still be held responsible for their past actions.
A lawsuit may involve the facility operator, a parent organization, individual employees, contractors, security companies, insurance carriers, or government agencies that had responsibility for placing, supervising, or protecting the child. In the Aunt Martha’s litigation, media reports identify Aunt Martha’s, A-Alert Security, and DCFS as parties tied to the allegations.
To bring a successful claim, the evidence must connect the abuse to a failure by one or more responsible parties. That may include evidence that the facility or agency:
- Failed to conduct proper background checks
- Ignored criminal history or other red flags
- Placed a child in an unsafe environment
- Failed to properly supervise employees or contractors
- Failed to respond to complaints or warning signs
- Failed to report suspected abuse
- Allowed a dangerous person to remain in contact with children
The key issue is not just that abuse occurred. The key issue is whether a facility, contractor, agency, or other responsible party failed to protect the child when it had a duty to do so.
These cases are fact-specific. A lawyer can investigate records, employment history, prior complaints, incident reports, DCFS involvement, security contracts, witness statements, and other evidence that may show how the abuse was allowed to happen.
Can a Foster Parent Sue on Behalf of the Foster Child?
In Illinois, a foster parent cannot generally file a claim on behalf of the child. While they look after the child’s basic needs and care for the child, they are not technically the child’s legal guardian, and custody of the child is retained by the state or designated agency.
When a child in foster care has been abused, the claim may need to be brought through the child’s legal guardian, a court-appointed representative, a guardian ad litem, or another person with legal authority to act for the child. Illinois courts can appoint a guardian ad litem, child representative, or attorney for the child in cases involving a minor’s welfare.
That does not mean foster parents are powerless. A foster parent who learns that a child has been abused should take the situation seriously, document concerns, report suspected abuse through the proper channels, and speak with a sexual abuse attorney about what steps may be available to protect the child’s rights.
The most important thing is getting the child to safety and making sure the people responsible are not allowed to hide behind the system that was supposed to protect them.
