Snapchat may face civil lawsuits if its platform design, safety systems, or failure to implement reasonable safeguards contributed to foreseeable harm involving minors. While Section 230 protects platforms from liability for user content, courts are increasingly examining whether product design decisions create preventable risks.
Table of Contents
Snapchat. We’ve all heard the name. The seemingly innocent messaging, image, and video sharing app has been around for ages, used by adults and teens alike to connect with users across the globe. But, just how harmful can the Snapchat app be?
Many parents are facing this question and others as their children become exposed to drug peddlers, bullies, and sexual predators through the app’s messaging platform, and the platform erasing messages and media after a set amount of time makes it harder to monitor your child’s activity on the app to ensure they are safe.
If your child was harmed due to Snapchat’s disappearing message motif, you may be wondering:
- How can I stop this from happening again?
- Who can I hold responsible for my child’s injuries?
You are not alone. All across the globe, parents are asking themselves these same questions as they deal with the emotional turmoil because of a predator who caused their child’s injuries (or, in some cases, death.) Understanding your rights in a Snapchat lawsuit is essential in moving forward and recovering from the damage that has been done to your family.
Has Snapchat Faced Lawsuits Before?
Yes. As of 2026, Snap, Inc., Snapchat’s parent company, is facing several major lawsuits involving:
- Addictive Platform Design and Teen Mental Health
- Illegal drug sales facilitated through the app’s messaging platform
- Sexual exploitation and grooming of minors
In January 2026, Snap settled a closely watched case before it went to trial. That case, considered a “bellwether case” was meant to test how a jury would respond to the case.
Why Is Suing Social Media So Hard?
For years, a law referred to as “Section 230” has protected social media platforms from liability by stating that the platform is not responsible for content posted by users.
In essence, this means that harm involves:
- A message sent by a drug dealer peddling their inventory
- A predator grooming a child
- Bullying that pressures a youth into self-harm
The company can argue: “We did not create that content. A user did.”
Courts across the country have often accepted this defense. Section 230 was originally designed to allow online platforms to moderate content without being treated like traditional publishers. Over time, however, it has become one of the most powerful legal shields in the tech industry.
But the legal landscape is shifting.
In 2026, courts are increasingly being asked to look beyond who created the content and instead examine whether a platform’s design, algorithms, and safety systems contributed to foreseeable harm. When the claim focuses on product design decisions rather than user speech, Section 230 may not provide the same level of protection.
That distinction is driving the next wave of litigation against social media companies.
Changes Regarding Social Media Lawsuits in 2026
The legal strategy surrounding lawsuits involving Snapchat and other social media platforms is changing. Instead of parents arguing that the platform failed to remove a dangerous user, they are now alleging that the platform’s design makes it more likely for harm to come to the children that use it.
This distinction matters. Courts are now examining whether certain features of the app are neutral tools, or if they were designed in ways that create foreseeable harm to minors.
Features under scrutiny include:
- Disappearing messages and media
- Snapstreaks that encourage constant engagement with the app
- The Quick Add feature that connects users with strangers around the world
- Private messaging between adults and minors
- Algorithm driven suggestions
This new argument is not based around the fact that bad actors exist, rather, it focuses on the design choices of the app and whether they may amplify the danger.
Real Criminal Cases Show the Stakes for Families
Federal prosecutions across Illinois show just how serious online exploitation has become. In one recent case, a suburban Chicago man was sentenced to 37 years in federal prison for sexually exploiting nearly 100 children, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois.
Cases like this demonstrate how predators use online platforms to contact, groom, manipulate, and exploit minors. While criminal prosecutions hold the individual offender accountable, they do not always address whether the technology platforms involved could have implemented stronger safeguards to prevent the abuse in the first place.
For many Chicago-area families, the question becomes twofold:
- How did this individual gain access to so many children?
- Were there missed warning signs or preventable design flaws?
- Could stronger reporting systems or monitoring tools have reduced the harm?
Criminal court punishes the perpetrator. Civil court examines whether a company’s product design, safety policies, or failure to act contributed to foreseeable harm.
When apps make it easy for adults to connect privately with minors, erase communications, or avoid meaningful verification systems, courts may increasingly examine whether those design choices created an environment where exploitation could flourish.
For parents in Illinois, this is not theoretical. It is happening in our communities.
When Can Snapchat Be Held Liable?
While not every harmful situation leads to a successful lawsuit, a Snapchat lawsuit may prove successful if there is evidence of repeated reports of dangerous accounts, known risks tied to specific features, failure to implement reasonable safeguards, or violations of state consumer laws. The key issue here is not what the user did, rather, it is what the company didn’t do to protect its users.
What About Snapchat’s Safety Features?
Snap, Inc. has publicly stated that:
- Teen accounts are defaulted to “private”
- Parent tools are available through the Family Center
- The app uses technology to detect drug sales
- The company invests in safety initiatives
These statements matter because if a company makes a specific promise about protecting minors, and internal evidence suggests those protections were incomplete or ineffective, that can be used in a legal case, as Section 230 does not protect a company from liability involving its own statements or misleading representations.
Frequently Asked Questions About Snapchat Lawsuits
Can I Sue Snapchat if My Child Was Sextorted Through the App?
You may be able to file a lawsuit against Snap Inc. if your child was sextorted through the app. A growing number of lawsuits against Snap Inc. have alleged that the app’s features, policies, and failure to act have contributed to child grooming and sexual exploitation.
Can I Sue if My Child Bought Drugs Through Snapchat?
Yes, you may be able to sue Snap Inc. if your child bought drugs through the app. This is especially true if the purchase resulted in overdose, fentanyl poisoning, or death. Recent court rulings have allowed lawsuits to proceed against the company that argue that the product design actively facilitates drug sales to minors.
Does Section 230 Mean I Have No Case?
While Section 230 remains a powerful defense for social media companies, it does not fully protect them from liability if their product design actively led to the harm or death of a child.
What Should I Do if My Child Was Harmed?
Remember that your child needs you during this time, and they may have trouble fully understanding what is happening to them and what they should do. Try and focus on helping them through this difficult time and being there for them. Make sure you guide them through gathering as much evidence as they can regarding what is happening to them, and help them understand what they’re going through is not their fault.
Once evidence is gathered, the next step is making a report to the proper authorities and consider consulting an attorney for help with the legal side of getting justice for your child.
Timing matters, as evidence can disappear over time and be harder to collect the longer you wait.
If a social media platform’s design contributed to your child’s harm, you deserve answers. Ankin Law represents families in complex negligence and product liability cases involving powerful corporations. Call 312-600-0000 to discuss your options.
